Enhancing Safety: Assessing the State of ADAS Safeguards Across Auto Brands

• 💡 ADAS safeguards across auto brands are lacking, as per IIHS study.
• 🚗 Most of the 14 partially automated systems tested received “marginal” or “poor” ratings.
• 🔍 Driver monitoring and attention reminders were low-rated categories across most brands.
• 📊 Categories individually rated included emergency procedures, lane change, adaptive cruise control, and more.
• ⚠️ Partially automated systems may not necessarily make driving safer, according to the research.
• 🏆 The top-rated systems included Lexus Teammate with Advanced Drive, GM Super Cruise, and Nissan ProPilot Assist with Navi-Link.
• 📉 No single system performed well across the board; improvements may be possible through software updates.

In an age where technology seems to intersect with every aspect of our lives, the automotive industry is no exception. Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) have become increasingly prevalent, promising safer and more convenient driving experiences. However, a recent study conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) sheds light on a concerning reality: ADAS safeguards across auto brands are lacking.

Understanding the Study’s Findings

The IIHS study evaluated 14 partially automated systems from various automakers, revealing alarming results. The majority of these systems received “marginal” or “poor” ratings, indicating significant deficiencies in their safety measures. Among the key areas of concern were driver monitoring and attention reminders, which were consistently low-rated categories across most brands.

Delving Into the Ratings

The study meticulously assessed various categories, including emergency procedures, lane change assistance, and adaptive cruise control. These ratings provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each system, highlighting areas where improvements are urgently needed.

You can see the full category breakdowns from tests of Tesla’s Autopilot and FSD beta systems from the IIHS below, along with those of a few others.

Challenging Assumptions

One of the most striking revelations from the study is the notion that partially automated systems may not necessarily enhance safety as anticipated. Despite the industry’s emphasis on safety, the research suggests that these systems could introduce new risks if they lack adequate safeguards.

Recognizing Top Performers

Amidst the concerning findings, there were a few bright spots. Systems such as Lexus Teammate with Advanced Drive, GM Super Cruise, and Nissan ProPilot Assist with Navi-Link received commendable ratings, showcasing their effectiveness in prioritizing driver safety.

Pathways to Improvement

While the overall outlook may seem bleak, there is room for optimism. The study suggests that improvements can be made through software updates, offering a glimmer of hope for enhancing the safety of partially automated systems.

Conclusion: Striving for Safer Roads

As technology continues to evolve, it is imperative that auto manufacturers prioritize the safety of their vehicles. The findings of the IIHS study serve as a wake-up call, highlighting the urgent need for enhanced ADAS safeguards. By addressing the shortcomings identified in the study and leveraging advancements in technology, we can work towards a future where road safety is paramount.

Below you can see overall ratings for each system tested.

You can view the full list of rankings with individual category rankings from the IIHS here, or view the institute’s test protocol and rating guidelines here. Additionally, see the institute’s press release detailing the rating system’s early results here.